The World responds to Syrian strikes by picking sides – Is WW3 Imminent?

CNN has released a potential line-up for what could become WW3 in the fallout of the US strikes on the Syrian airbase.

The information released to the public so far on the initial chemical attack and follow-up Tomahawk strikes by the US has seen not only the world divide, but both Trump supporters and detractors change their stances on the President and his actions.

The majority of the mainstream media have viewed the strikes in a positive light whilst many of Trump’s more vocal supporters have come out in opposition of the military intervention.

One thing is for sure, no one outside of military and political insiders close to the Trump, Putin and Assad camps have 100% of the facts and are basing their opinions on assumptions and the official positions of the governments rather than the complete facts.

US officials and allies described the attack, which saw 59 tomahawk missiles launched from US Navy warships in the Mediterranean Sea, as a one-off that would not lead to further escalation. 

Supporting Syrian Strikes

  • 🇺🇸 USA
  • 🇬🇧 United Kingdom
  • 🇩🇪 Germany
  • 🇦🇺 Australia
  • 🇫🇷 France
  • 🇪🇸 Spain
  • 🇮🇱 Israel
  • 🇨🇦 Canada
  • 🇯🇵 Japan
  • 🇹🇷 Turkey
  • 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia

Against Syrian Strikes

  • 🇸🇾 Syria – Assad Government
  • 🇷🇺 Russia
  • 🇨🇳 China
  • 🇮🇷 Iran

Assured Neutrality​

  • 🇨🇭 Switzerland

For all we know, in 50yrs time we may look back on the Syrian chemical attack in the same way we look back on the assassination of the Archduke of Austria-Este Franz Ferdinand – As the trigger point for a World War.

    Given the choices, I’m sure many would prefer if certain countries were on opposite sides of this potential war. I for one would much prefer if Russia and China were to swap positions with Saudi Arabia and Turkey, but the only hopeful outcome is that this current conflict does not escalate to the point of a third world war.

    Noting sides of WW1 & WW2

    World War 1

      Allies (at one point or another)

      Central Powers

      Neutral countries

    World War 2

    The devastation and number of casualties seen by both sides in each of these wars should be enough to see most people wish for a solution to this conflict that does not result in all out war…


    Christian Charities live in fear of bigotted “Equality” activists

    The defenders of “equality” have proved to be anything but and it is absolutely disgraceful that the mainstream leftist media refuse to acknowledge the true bigotry going on in our country!

    Following the Coopers brewery boycott and condemning of IBM, there is this morning news that:

    “Mark Allaby, a managing partner at IBM Australia, has been pressured to resign his board position at the Lachlan Macquarie Institute (LMI) after he was subject to an online campaign for daring to sit on the board of a faith-based organisation.

    It seems the idea of the ‘diversity’-supporting IBM employing someone with differing views on marriage was enough to send LGBT activists into a social media rage.” – Damian Wyld, Marriage Alliance.

    The Australian has today reported that:

    Two Christian charities have been granted official permission to keep their board members’ names secret on the grounds of “public safety”, after abuse and threats from gay activists forced an IBM executive to sever his links with a Christian education group.

    The Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission yesterday agreed to keep the boards of the Lachlan Macquarie Institute and the Australian Christian Lobby off the public record ­because publication “could ­endanger public safety”.

    The Lachlan Macquarie Institute and the ACL applied to the commission last week after militant gay rights activists targeted marriage equality advocate IBM Australia for employing Mark ­Allaby, who was on the Institute’s board. Both organisations removed the details of their boards and staff from their websites last week, as gay activists increased pressure on IBM and started to circulate the names and jobs of the Christian board members.

    The charities commission took all the details of the two charities off its register, a public record, on receiving the request to keep the names private. After agreeing to the request, the commission put the details of the two Christian charities back on its register yesterday with the names of “responsible people” withheld.

    If the militant LGBTABC brigade and left-wing professional protestors actually gave a fuck about true equality or standards of safety for the LGBTABC community it wouldn’t be Christian organisations they were going after, it would be Islamic organisations.

    After all, when was the last time Christian groups were found to be throwing gays off buildings?

    When you take a step back it becomes very clear who is in control of the left.. 

    Afterall, who can’t you criticize?

    Australian Muslim leader calls for murder during Bankstown Hizb ut-Tahrir meeting.

    The Australian branch of the ideologically dangerous, Islamic extremists known as Hizb ut-Tahrir have this week at a meeting in Bankstown, Sydney called for the murder of apostates (ex-Muslims).

    Hizb ut-Tahrir’s extremist spokesman and probable future terrorist Uthman Badar.

    Stephen Johnson of The Daily Mail wrote:

    A leader of a hardline Islamist group which campaigns for sharia law says Muslims who leave the religion should be put to death.

    Hizb ut-Tahrir spokesman Uthman Badar was frank when asked about the group’s policy at a forum in Bankstown, in Sydney’s south-west, on Saturday night.

    ‘The ruling for apostates as such in Islam is clear, that apostates attract capital punishment and we don’t shy away from that,’ Badar said. An apostate is someone who decides to leave Islam. 

    His extraordinary admission was exclusively captured on camera by Daily Mail Australia and the matter has now been referred to the Australian Federal Police by Justice Minister Michael Keenan.

    Hizb ut-Tahrir Australia removed references to that policy from its website after Alison Bevege, a freelance journalist, successfully sued the group for making her to sit in a women’s-only section at a separate talk in October 2014.

    On Saturday night, Ms Bevege held up a printed copy of Hizb ut-Tahrir’s draft constitution in the UK, which was on the group’s Australian website until 2015, and asked about the measure. 

    Below is video footage from the event.

    Hizb ut-Tahrir is the same Australian extremist group that “feminist Muslim activist” Yassmin Abdel-Magied sought out assistance after lying to the Australian public about the merits of Sharia Law on the ABC’s QandA program, leading to our petition for her statements to be condemned and her to be sacked from the taxpayer funded broadcaster.

    You can join 30,000 others in signing the petition here.

    Hizb ut-Tahrir is also the same Australian extremist group who in 2015 released a statement refusing to condemn the Charlie Hebdo’s terrorist attacks, instead they chose to criticize the French satire magazine, and described western leaders as criminals and warned the Australian people that insults to Islam would end in violence.

    In 2014 Another prominent Hizb ut-Tahrir Australian member, Wassim Doureihi appeared on the ABC’s Lateline with reporter Emma Alberici where he refused multiple times to answer her questions and condemn the actions of ISIS, aswell as refusing to instruct young Australian Muslims to not join ISIS.

    See the video below.

    ALTCON CONTRIBUTOR Michael Nassar – Twitter: @MichaelNassar8
    Is an Australian citizen, born to a traditional Muslim family in Egypt, who is secular and is heavily critical of political Islam and has provided us with a list of his Top 14 plans on how to deal with Islam in Australia.

    1. Revoke Citizenship of Convicted Terrorists.
    2. Charge anyone who incites violence in any shape or form.
    3. Monitor Mosques (with both audio and video surveillance)
    4. Ban the Burqua and Niqab in public places.
    5. NO praying in streets UNDER any circumstances.
    6. NO call for any Islamic prayers outside of mosques (bells, alarms, sirens etc)
    7. Muslim men who father many children to many women SHOULD be punished.
    8. Scrutinize ALL charities and Child Care Centres founded by Muslims and the government to audit these yearly.
    9. NO concessions or special treatments such as days off for any Islamic festivals (such as Ramadan etc)
    10. Monitor Muslims with criminal records as they have higher rates of turning to terrorism.
    11. Segregate jailed terrorists as jail to them is a breeding ground.
    12. Monitor converts to Islam.
    13. STOP the public funding for Islamic schools nation wide.
    14. STOP, minimize and eradicate ALL sorts of foreign funding for any Islamic institutions in Australia and monitor all existing institutions.


    The Daily Mail

    The Australian

    6/75 Senators voted to freeze their pay for the good of the budget – My message to the rest!

    Out of 75 senators, only 6 voted to forego payrises until the federal government brings the budget back into surplus!

    The Libs, Labor and Greens showed themselves to be the fat cats we know they are by putting their own salaries ahead of the Australian budget.
    Interesting to note that senators and members receive an annual allowance by way of basic salaray – $199,040 from 1 January 2016.

    Surely that’s an ample salary?

    So you’re probably wondering who the senators were who voted to freeze their pay.. Actually, you’re probably not. It’s quite obvious who the 6 are!

    Australian Conservatives Cory Bernardi

    Liberal Democrats David Leyonhjelm

    One Nation Pauline Hanson, Malcolm Roberts & Brian Burston

    Independant Jacqui Lambie

    The petulant parasitic puppet Richard Di Natale of The Greens said he was:

    “sympathetic to the intent of the proposal but wanted it amended to freeze pay rises until the government was prepared to address inequality in Australia”

    In other words he won’t take a pay freeze or heaven forbid a pay cut until the loony left stop crying over spilt milk and “inequality”… 

    Well, to Senator Di Natale, your Green and Labor cohorts, the Nick Xenophon Team and the rest of the fat cats in the Liberal Party (who still don’t know what their constituents want!) 

    I feel I’d be remiss if I didn’t take this opportunity to send you a message on behalf of the vast majority of Australians:

    Its a simple message because I honestly cant believe that you morons STILL dont get it!


    The Australian

    New Union Boss: “It’s okay for Unions to break the law”

    The new boss of the ACTU (Australian Council of Trade Unions) Sally McManus has said she’s believes in breaking laws, when those laws are seen as “unjust and unfair”…

     ​First their ABC publishes an anti-Saudi Arabia article and now they publish these remarks by a clearly unhinged leftist, who states “It’s okay to break laws if you find them unjust!”.. It’s getting awfully Twilight Zoney in here!!The late Bill leak summed up the unions perfectly in this cartoon!

    Here’s the transcript of the above video:

    SALES: Do you believe in the rule of law?

    MCMANUS: Uh, yes

    SALES: Given that, will the ACTU consider distancing itself from the CFMEU which has faced 118 separate legal proceedings where it’s either broken the law, or acted in contempt of court?

    MCMANUS: There is no way we will be doing that. I’ll tell you this, the CFMEU when they’ve been fined, they’ve been fined for taking industrial action-

    SALES: Illegal industrial action

    MCMANUS: It might be illegal industrial action according to our current laws and our current laws are wrong. It shouldn’t be so hard for workers in our country to take industrial action when they need to. Quite often these workers have stopped work because a worker has been killed on a building site. And know this, that union gets fined more than the companies that actually kill workers. So Grocon got fined $330,000 for killing five workers and the CFMEU got fined even more and I just think that’s totally wrong.

    SALES: Yet nonetheless we live in a country where there are laws established by a parliament that all citizens are expected to abide by. So regardless of whether you agree or disagree with those laws, you said you agree with the rule of law.

    MCMANUS: Yeah I believe in the rule of law when the law is fair and the law is right, but when it’s unjust I don’t think there’s a problem with breaking it.